It doesn't make him a bad person. Or so says the Washington State Supreme Court which just:
...overturned the death sentence of Cecil E. Davis yesterday, finding that a juror's glimpses of the defendant's ankle shackles in the Pierce County courtroom may have prejudiced the jury.
"Prejudiced"? Reading on:
In reviewing Davis' case, the majority in the 8-1 decision found the evidence too "overwhelming" to toss out Davis' conviction for aggravated first-degree murder in the slaying of his 65-year-old neighbor, Yoshiko Couch of Tacoma. But it also found that the image of Davis' shackled ankles may have given jurors a "negative inference as to [Davis'] character"....
As opposed to the testimony they'd heard, we suppose:
Davis, a career criminal, was convicted in 1998 of raping, robbing and murdering Couch, while her disabled husband slept downstairs. Couch was poisoned with a towel soaked in cleaning solvents.
Which led to this deadpan from the prosecutor who tried the case:
It didn't appear to me that there was very strong logic and reasoning behind their decision....It's frustrating.